Planned unParenthood Marks 96th B-day w/ 6 Mill Abortions #PROLife


What’s so sickening about this is the response from Liberals: those weren’t babies, those were a woman’s choice.  That’s a straight up crock of bull.

Via LifeNews.com:

Planned Parenthood marks its 96th birthday today and one leading pro-life activists who has been a watchdog of the abortion business for decades estimates Planned Parenthood has denied 6 million unborn children birthdays of their own.

“In 2010, Planned Parenthood did 27 percent of all the abortions in the United States. It has ended the lives of over 6,000,000 human beings in its own facilities since 1970. And, during that same time, it collected over $6 billion in taxpayer money,” says Jim Sedlak of American Life League.

Sedlak says Planned Parenthood has a history of preying on black Americans.

“Planned Parenthood Federation of America dates its beginning to Oct. 16, 1916, when Margaret Sanger opened the nation’s first birth control clinic in Brooklyn, New York,” he explained. “Sanger had three basic philosophies that are still active within Planned Parenthood today.

One of those was a passion to prevent the birth of “defectives,” which Sedlak says led to her stating in her 1932 Plan for Peace that persons from “dysgenic groups” should be given their choice of sterilization or confinement on a farm for the rest of their lives. Sanger was a member of the American Eugenics Society.

“Planned Parenthood does not make public the race of its abortion clients anymore. In the 1990s, it revealed that 43 percent of its abortions were on blacks and other minorities – who only made up 22 percent of the population,” he explained.

Today, looking at the most recent figures from Planned Parenthood, it did 329,445 abortions in 2010 while it provided prenatal care to only 31,098 women and referred only 841 women to adoption agencies.

So watch this video made in response to the Hollywood Dingbats:

Here’s the transcript:

The following is text of the ad:

I want to talk to you about women …

Hollywood women.

You know, the ones with the personal stylists, a three-bedroom wardrobe, and so into themselves they actually think they speak for all women.

In a recent ad, some of them tried to scare women by saying that Romney wants to “overturn” Roe v. Wade.

Have they ever heard of the separation of powers?  Presidents don’t overturn Supreme Court cases.

But I’ll tell you what they can do.  They can make sure these Hollywood elitists don’t succeed in making those of us who actually value human life, including the unborn, pay for another woman’s abortion.

Talk about invasive. …

[TEXT] Vote your conscience.

[TEXT] Do not let Hollywood manipulate your vote!

[TEXT] This message brought to you by Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee,www.cwalac.org

Facebook Comments

comments

Share this post

5 comments

Add yours
  1. Benin Brown (@BeninB) 17 October, 2012 at 20:46 Reply

    Thank you so much for publicizing this Stacy. This is something more people should be aware of – like yesterday.

    But allow me to ask an honest question. Given the left’s penchant for conveniently ignoring history, facts and figures – do you think anyone on the left will give serious consideration to the dark history behind planned parenthood?

    Thanks in advance for your response!

  2. Voting for Romney 22 October, 2012 at 13:06 Reply

    The whole notion of the pro-life pro-choice is a misnomer and labeled designed to cause confusion. The real debate is about being pro-choice/anti-choice. You can believe that abortion is wrong and not the way to go, and raise your children in that belief system, yet you can also embrace the Constitution in it’s entirety and understand that your beliefs are your beliefs and you don’t have the right to enforce those beliefs on others, as you wouldn’t want others to force their beliefs on you.

    Either one fully embraces the choice of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, or they are picking and choosing. Picking and choosing is what weakens the Constitution.

    So you may say “what about the life & liberty of the fetus?” I’m not debating on whether we should consider the fetus life or not. In this case, the mothers rights comes first. She is already here and is the fully independent emancipated life form. The woman’s life does not depend on the fetus, but the fetus’ life depends on the mother. (The adult puts their oxygen mask on before assisting the child). What the woman does with her body is between her and her God, and as a country that was founded on the Constitution, we cannot interfere with that. You cannot remove a person’s freedom and say you are 100% for the Constitution.

    God gave women the responsibility to nurture life into the world. Who are we to say that God is wrong by taking that responsibility away? (No one can be responsible if their choice is removed.) God is infinitely more wise than I, so it’s pretty arrogant to say that we humans know better than God in this case.

    • StacyOnTheRight 22 October, 2012 at 14:18 Reply

      You’re reasoning is dead wrong. How would you feel if the argument was made about murder in general? I would never murder anyone, but if YOU want to, then that is YOUR choice. It would be too bad if you then wanted to murder someone that I loved wouldn’t it? Just because a law has been codified and a behavior is made legal, doesn’t make it morally right. Slavery was once the law of the land here. It is now known that keeping human beings as slaves is wrong. Your premise that Abortion is protected by the Constitution is fallacious. And your reasoning about God approving abortion is blasphemous. Please try reading the Bible.

Post a new comment